What in this case is the . Or how would I get a contradiction? E.g. if I said A B C D are equidistant, α β γ δ are not equidistant & parallel lines are drawn between them.
And here Russells correlation seems to furnish a criterion of their correlatability. A logical criterion.
Isn't it very queer that by just looking at the names I should be able to say whether or not a certain relation held between the objects?
But correlate the names. And why? To see whether a correlation exist|subsist between the things.
We draw lines in our thought